Parties Oppose FCC Bid for DC Circuit Remand of Tariff Case, to Seek 8th Circuit BDS Transfer

Incompas and Sprint opposed an FCC motion that a court remand business data service tariff litigation in which AT&T is challenging a 2016 agency order that found certain incumbent telco BDS tariff provisions unlawful (see 1706140012). Granting the commission's request, which cited a 2006 BellSouth v. FCC ruling, "would needlessly delay resolution of a case" affecting much of the telecom industry, said the two intervenors in their opposition (in Pacer) Friday to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in AT&T v. FCC, No. 16-1166. Incompas and Sprint also said they intend to ask the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to transfer separate challenges to the FCC's recent deregulatory BDS order to the D.C. Circuit "so that both cases may be heard by the same panel." Windstream and others asked the FCC to stay that BDS order (see 1706260054). In their opposition, Incompas and Sprint noted the FCC's 2016 tariff investigation order required AT&T and other major ILECs to remove from their pricing plans "unjust and unreasonable" contract provisions, including "all-or-nothing" terms and some volume-shortfall and early-termination penalties. They said voluntary remand is usually granted when there's new evidence or a new event that may affect the validity of agency actions. "None of those circumstances has occurred here," said their opposition. "Instead, the Commission asks -- without confessing error -- for remand to consider an eleven-year-old case that ... is not relevant." Meanwhile, the FCC Friday in a status report (in Pacer) asked the D.C. Circuit to continue to hold in abeyance a USTelecom case challenging an interim technology transitions wholesale access rule that will expire with the implementation of new special access (BDS) rules, which were adopted in April and most of which take effect Aug. 1 (see 1706020060). In USTelecom v. FCC, No. 15-1414, the telco group also is challenging the previous FCC's interpretation of Communications Act Section 214, which the current commission proposed to reverse in a recent wireline broadband deployment NPRM that drew many comments this month (see 1706160041).