Parties Stipulate to Dismissal of Foldable Smartphone Fraud Claims vs. Samsung
Samsung and plaintiff Antonio Lewis agreed that Lewis’ foldable smartphone fraud claims should be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its costs and attorneys’ fees, said their stipulation of dismissal Tuesday (docket 1:22-cv-10882) in U.S. District Court for Southern New York in Manhattan. Lewis of Charlottesville, Virginia, alleged in his December class action that Samsung’s advertised claim that its Z Fold 3 smartphone can be folded and unfolded at least 200,000 times -- the number of such actions a user would perform in five years -- is based on “flawed” testing methodology and “not representative of real-world usage” (see 2301030027).