Progress Software Corp. (PSC) and Pension Benefit Information (PBI) “owed duties” to plaintiff Rosemary Mosqueda and class members, said a Tuesday class action (docket 0:23-cv-02278) in U.S. District Court for Minnesota about a May 27 data breach affecting PSI’s MOVEit software.
Rebecca Day
Rebecca Day, Senior editor, joined Warren Communications News in 2010. She’s a longtime CE industry veteran who has also written about consumer tech for Popular Mechanics, Residential Tech Today, CE Pro and others. You can follow Day on Instagram and Twitter: @rebday
“YouTube applies its Community Guidelines independently, transparently, and consistently, regardless of political viewpoint," emailed Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda Thursday, responding to a freedom of speech lawsuit (docket 3:23-cv-03880) filed Wednesday by Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in U.S. District Court for Northern California in San Francisco. Kennedy's claims are "meritless and we look forward to refuting them," Castaneda said.
Plaintiff Jerome Edmondson, CEO of EDN Global, attempted to avoid written contracts with AT&T when he tried to “plead around” them “by omitting a breach claim and instead asserting a host of tort claims,” said AT&T Tuesday in its memorandum in support (docket 3:23-cv-00355) of its motion to dismiss Edmondson and EDN's amended complaint for failure to state a claim.
Activision Blizzard “lacks sufficient information to admit or deny” that plaintiff Sorina Montoya spent over $3,000 in a Candy Crush tournament -- and so therefore “denies it” -- said the video game company in a Tuesday answer (docket 3:23-cv-00314) to Montoya’s fraud class action in U.S. District Court for Eastern Virginia in Richmond.
CEO Imran Ahmed of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) spared few punches Tuesday in attacking Elon Musk, owner of the X platform, formerly Twitter, a day after the platform sued his group for allegedly running a "scare campaign" to drive away advertisers. Musk’s "latest legal threat is straight out of the authoritarian playbook," emailed Ahmed.
Plaintiff Tracy McCarthy’s fraud claims against Amazon and its Audible subsidiary for deceptive practices under New York General Business Law (GBL) are time-barred and “duplicative,” said Amazon’s motion to dismiss (docket 2:23-cv-01019) the first amended complaint (FAC) Monday in U.S. District Court for Washington in Seattle.
GlobalguruTech’s (GGT) July 14 motion to quash Xfinity Mobile’s subpoenas to payment service companies is improper because defendants don’t have standing to object to the wireless carrier’s subpoenas since they're directed to third parties, not to the defendants, said Xfinity’s Thursday response (docket 2:22-cv-01950) in U.S. District Court for Arizona in Phoenix. Also, a motion to quash must be filed in the place where compliance is required, which is the Northern District of Georgia, not the district of Arizona, it said.
Amazon removed a seller breach of contract case (docket 1:23-cv-06549) from New York Supreme Court to the U.S. District Court for Southern New York in Manhattan Thursday, saying China-based Shenzhen Xingchen Xuanyuan Industrial’s verified complaint is subject to an arbitration agreement.
The U.S. District Court for Eastern New York should remand a negligence lawsuit to Suffolk County Supreme Court, recommended U.S. Magistrate Judge James Wicks in a Thursday report (docket 2:23-cv-02786), submitted as supplemental information by the Social Media Victims Law Center before the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
Dynatrace is "aware" of the privacy class action filed against the company Wednesday in U.S. District Court for Massachusetts in Boston (see 2307270025), "and believes it is without merit,” emailed a spokesperson Friday. Dynatrace “at this time" intends to "vigorously defend itself against these allegations,” said the spokesperson. Plaintiffs Alyssa Gary and Marla Defoort allege in their class action that Dynatrace's session replay spyware “wiretaps” the electronic communications of “thousands” of website visitors, secretly observing and recording their “keystrokes, mouse clicks, data entry, and other electronic communications, in real time.” The plaintiffs allege Dynatrace software intercepted their interactions with the Ulta Beauty website in December without their consent.