Critics of Charter Communications buying Bright House Networks and Time Warner Cable are continuing to lobby the FCC, seeking conditions or full blockage. The docket had been relatively quiet until the FCC paused the 180-day shot clock earlier this month, one cable industry lawyer told us. The shot clock resumed Wednesday and stood at 118 days Friday.

Critics of Charter Communications buying Bright House Networks and Time Warner Cable are continuing to lobby the FCC, seeking conditions or full blockage. The docket had been relatively quiet until the FCC paused the 180-day shot clock earlier this month, one cable industry lawyer told us. The shot clock resumed Wednesday and stood at 118 days Friday.

Critics of Charter Communications buying Bright House Networks and Time Warner Cable are continuing to lobby the FCC, seeking conditions or full blockage. The docket had been relatively quiet until the FCC paused the 180-day shot clock earlier this month, one cable industry lawyer told us. The shot clock resumed Wednesday and stood at 118 days Friday.

Comcast's lobbying cost dropped in Q4 by more than $1 million. It spent $3.94 million, compared with the $5.03 million it spent a year ago, when Comcast was fighting to get an ultimately unsuccessful acquisition of Time Warner Cable approved by federal regulators and in the midst of satellite TV reauthorization on Capitol Hill. Charter Communications, meanwhile, is trying to get acquisitions of Bright House Networks and TWC approved now and is spending more. It clocked $1.16 million in Q4, well up from the $730,000 it spent in that time a year ago. USTelecom spent $1.73 million, roughly on par with the $1.75 million from last year. CTIA was another big spender, with $3.24 million on lobbying in Q4. Incompas spent $296,000 this Q4 versus $409,577 last. Lobbying disclosure forms were due Wednesday (see 1601200061).

Comcast's lobbying cost dropped in Q4 by more than $1 million. It spent $3.94 million, compared with the $5.03 million it spent a year ago, when Comcast was fighting to get an ultimately unsuccessful acquisition of Time Warner Cable approved by federal regulators and in the midst of satellite TV reauthorization on Capitol Hill. Charter Communications, meanwhile, is trying to get acquisitions of Bright House Networks and TWC approved now and is spending more. It clocked $1.16 million in Q4, well up from the $730,000 it spent in that time a year ago. USTelecom spent $1.73 million, roughly on par with the $1.75 million from last year. CTIA was another big spender, with $3.24 million on lobbying in Q4. Incompas spent $296,000 this Q4 versus $409,577 last. Lobbying disclosure forms were due Wednesday (see 1601200061).

Broadband customer churn data from when Netflix was being throttled in 2014 shows Charter Communications after buying Bright House Networks and Time Warner Cable "will be able to have its cake and eat it too: hurt competitors of its video business without hurting its broadband business," Dish Network said in its latest salvo of opposition to the proposed set of deals. In a filing Wednesday in docket 15-149, Dish -- which has staunchly opposed FCC approval of the deals -- submitted a heavily redacted Charter, BHN and TWC churn rate analysis by William Zarakas of economics consulting firm Brattle Group to argue the companies didn't suffer worse churn rates due to past throttling. "Even if we assume that most broadband customers understand the reason for a poor broadband experience -- a very large assumption -- switching is most often impossible because there is no reasonable broadband alternative in the marketplace," Dish said. It also repeated arguments it made in the past that post-merger Charter would have plenty of opportunity and motive to form a de facto duopoly with Comcast -- especially since major Charter shareholder John Malone "has been described as 'keen to see the industry consolidate, noting that cooperation would complement mergers.'" In a statement, Charter said, given Dish's "past history of manipulating government regulations to improve its business, it is not surprising [it] is opposing Charter’s pending transactions. Dish’s claims are without merit. The information on which Dish relies, as well as documents filed with the FCC that Dish ignores, demonstrates Charter’s recognition that [online video distributors, or] OVDs[,] are a complement to its growing broadband business. There is no better partner for OVDs than Charter; we provide fast broadband speeds at a better value, with no data caps, no usage based billing, no modem fees, and no annual contracts.” Charter also pointed to comments Tuesday by Netflix CEO Reed Hastings during the company's Q4 2015 earnings call (see 1601190069) in which he said Charter/TWC/BHN "would be a tremendous positive for the [over-the-top] industry because Charter has agreed to a multi-year strong net neutrality policy, something no one else has publicly agreed to. That means that we, Hulu, Amazon and others can compete on an open basis." Charter increasingly is responding to critics. In a blog post Tuesday, Charter said red flags raised by Incompas (see 1512070025) were "incorrect and illogical." The trade group "makes the classic merger analysis mistake of confusing harm to New Charter’s competitors with harm to competition," Charter said. "Aren’t lower prices good for consumers and competition? [Under Incompas' logic] mergers would be good if they result in higher prices because that would encourage investment by new entrants. That kind of spin does not pass the laugh test." Charter also said since TWC already buys programming for BHN, adding Charter to the buying group means an extra 4 million subscribers, or about 4 percent of the nation's multichannel video programming distributor marketplace -- "not an overwhelming increase by any measure," and smaller than Comcast or AT&T.

Broadband customer churn data from when Netflix was being throttled in 2014 shows Charter Communications after buying Bright House Networks and Time Warner Cable "will be able to have its cake and eat it too: hurt competitors of its video business without hurting its broadband business," Dish Network said in its latest salvo of opposition to the proposed set of deals. In a filing Wednesday in docket 15-149, Dish -- which has staunchly opposed FCC approval of the deals -- submitted a heavily redacted Charter, BHN and TWC churn rate analysis by William Zarakas of economics consulting firm Brattle Group to argue the companies didn't suffer worse churn rates due to past throttling. "Even if we assume that most broadband customers understand the reason for a poor broadband experience -- a very large assumption -- switching is most often impossible because there is no reasonable broadband alternative in the marketplace," Dish said. It also repeated arguments it made in the past that post-merger Charter would have plenty of opportunity and motive to form a de facto duopoly with Comcast -- especially since major Charter shareholder John Malone "has been described as 'keen to see the industry consolidate, noting that cooperation would complement mergers.'" In a statement, Charter said, given Dish's "past history of manipulating government regulations to improve its business, it is not surprising [it] is opposing Charter’s pending transactions. Dish’s claims are without merit. The information on which Dish relies, as well as documents filed with the FCC that Dish ignores, demonstrates Charter’s recognition that [online video distributors, or] OVDs[,] are a complement to its growing broadband business. There is no better partner for OVDs than Charter; we provide fast broadband speeds at a better value, with no data caps, no usage based billing, no modem fees, and no annual contracts.” Charter also pointed to comments Tuesday by Netflix CEO Reed Hastings during the company's Q4 2015 earnings call (see 1601190069) in which he said Charter/TWC/BHN "would be a tremendous positive for the [over-the-top] industry because Charter has agreed to a multi-year strong net neutrality policy, something no one else has publicly agreed to. That means that we, Hulu, Amazon and others can compete on an open basis." Charter increasingly is responding to critics. In a blog post Tuesday, Charter said red flags raised by Incompas (see 1512070025) were "incorrect and illogical." The trade group "makes the classic merger analysis mistake of confusing harm to New Charter’s competitors with harm to competition," Charter said. "Aren’t lower prices good for consumers and competition? [Under Incompas' logic] mergers would be good if they result in higher prices because that would encourage investment by new entrants. That kind of spin does not pass the laugh test." Charter also said since TWC already buys programming for BHN, adding Charter to the buying group means an extra 4 million subscribers, or about 4 percent of the nation's multichannel video programming distributor marketplace -- "not an overwhelming increase by any measure," and smaller than Comcast or AT&T.

Broadband customer churn data from when Netflix was being throttled in 2014 shows Charter Communications after buying Bright House Networks and Time Warner Cable "will be able to have its cake and eat it too: hurt competitors of its video business without hurting its broadband business," Dish Network said in its latest salvo of opposition to the proposed set of deals. In a filing Wednesday in docket 15-149, Dish -- which has staunchly opposed FCC approval of the deals -- submitted a heavily redacted Charter, BHN and TWC churn rate analysis by William Zarakas of economics consulting firm Brattle Group to argue the companies didn't suffer worse churn rates due to past throttling. "Even if we assume that most broadband customers understand the reason for a poor broadband experience -- a very large assumption -- switching is most often impossible because there is no reasonable broadband alternative in the marketplace," Dish said. It also repeated arguments it made in the past that post-merger Charter would have plenty of opportunity and motive to form a de facto duopoly with Comcast -- especially since major Charter shareholder John Malone "has been described as 'keen to see the industry consolidate, noting that cooperation would complement mergers.'" In a statement, Charter said, given Dish's "past history of manipulating government regulations to improve its business, it is not surprising [it] is opposing Charter’s pending transactions. Dish’s claims are without merit. The information on which Dish relies, as well as documents filed with the FCC that Dish ignores, demonstrates Charter’s recognition that [online video distributors, or] OVDs[,] are a complement to its growing broadband business. There is no better partner for OVDs than Charter; we provide fast broadband speeds at a better value, with no data caps, no usage based billing, no modem fees, and no annual contracts.” Charter also pointed to comments Tuesday by Netflix CEO Reed Hastings during the company's Q4 2015 earnings call (see 1601190069) in which he said Charter/TWC/BHN "would be a tremendous positive for the [over-the-top] industry because Charter has agreed to a multi-year strong net neutrality policy, something no one else has publicly agreed to. That means that we, Hulu, Amazon and others can compete on an open basis." Charter increasingly is responding to critics. In a blog post Tuesday, Charter said red flags raised by Incompas (see 1512070025) were "incorrect and illogical." The trade group "makes the classic merger analysis mistake of confusing harm to New Charter’s competitors with harm to competition," Charter said. "Aren’t lower prices good for consumers and competition? [Under Incompas' logic] mergers would be good if they result in higher prices because that would encourage investment by new entrants. That kind of spin does not pass the laugh test." Charter also said since TWC already buys programming for BHN, adding Charter to the buying group means an extra 4 million subscribers, or about 4 percent of the nation's multichannel video programming distributor marketplace -- "not an overwhelming increase by any measure," and smaller than Comcast or AT&T.

Multichannel video programming distributors may be at a disadvantage in the fight over possible changes to good-faith retransmission consent negotiation rules, former FCC official Adonis Hoffman told us Friday. "Because of their proximity to communities and the high-touch nature of television, I give the edge to broadcasters, who are hyper-local and have a high name-identification quotient. Plus, broadcasters have shown their ability to mobilize members of Congress who understand that all politics is local," Hoffman, who was chief of staff to Commissioner Mignon Clyburn, said in an email. In multiple filings posted Friday in docket 15-216, broadcasters and MVPDs and allies assailed each other's arguments about possible changes to the "totality of circumstances" test and defended their own turf. Thursday was the deadline for reply comments.

Large telcos said the FCC should close or delay a probe of their special access terms and conditions that the companies said were lawful. AT&T, CenturyLink, Frontier Communications and Verizon made lengthy filings in docket 15-247 defending their special access pricing practices, which often contain discounts in exchange for volume or term commitments. The Bells/ILECs were responding to a Wireline Bureau tariff investigation of their special access contracts (see 1510160060), which rivals allege are anticompetitive and “lock up” much demand for traditional business data services (see 1510080051). Competitors continued to criticize incumbent telco practices Monday.