LOUISVILLE -- Just as states are pursuing a few approaches to shore up their own USFs, state regulators have a similar array of ideas about how the federal government can put its funds for broadband and other telecom services on sounder financial footing. In interviews on the sidelines of NARUC's gathering and in phone interviews for those who didn't travel here for the Sunday-Wednesday event, commissioners generally agreed the path the federal USF is on isn't sustainable because the percentage fee on some telecom services that consumers are levied on their monthly bills has gone up in recent years.

President Joe Biden plans to sign “very soon” the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (HR-3684) once “the congressional members” involved in getting the measure through both chambers “come back” from a weeklong recess, meaning it likely won't happen until at least Nov. 15, White House Deputy Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters Monday. The House voted 228-206 Friday to agree to the Senate-passed version of HR-3684, which includes $65 billion for broadband (see 2108020061). The Senate approved the bill in August (see 2108100062). The measure will make “high-speed internet affordable and available everywhere in America,” Biden said Saturday. “No parent should have to sit in a parking lot of a fast food restaurant so their child can do their homework because they have no” other broadband connection. Senate Communications Subcommittee Chairman Ben Ray Lujan, D-N.M., touted HR-3684 as “the most significant investment in our nation’s infrastructure in generations,” including for broadband. “Every community -- regardless of zip code -- needs and deserves access to reliable, affordable, high-speed internet, and with today’s action we take a giant step toward making that a reality,” said House Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone, D- N.J., Friday. Communications stakeholders praised House passage, including ACA Connects, American Library Association, Connect Americans Now, Fiber Broadband Association, Free Press, Frontier Communications, Incompas, Internet Innovation Alliance, National Governors Association, NTCA, Public Knowledge, TechNet, Wireless Infrastructure Association, Wireless ISP Association and WTA.

The Voice on the Net Coalition sought two more weeks for comments, another two for replies, on a Further NPRM addressing robocalls and gateway providers (see 2111040058). The request was backed by the Cloud Communications Alliance, CTIA, GSMA, Incompas, NCTA, NTCA and USTelecom.

Collecting regulatory fees from tech companies and users of unlicensed spectrum would be a huge task, outside FCC authority, and hamper broadband adoption, said trade associations and others in comments posted to docket 21-190 by Thursday’s deadline.

The FCC Wireline Bureau granted a request by groups including Public Knowledge, the Communications Workers of America and Incompas to extend the comment period for Embarq's, now Century/Lumen, petition to discontinue its legacy phone service, said an order Friday in docket 21-298 (see 2110180067). Comments are now due by Nov. 24, replies Dec. 16.

Collecting regulatory fees from tech companies and users of unlicensed spectrum would be a huge task, outside FCC authority, and hamper broadband adoption, said trade associations and others in comments posted to docket 21-190 by Thursday’s deadline. Comments about establishing a small satellite regulatory fee also had multiple calls in the commercial space sector for creating new fee categories for other types of space operations.

The FCC received mixed reaction as it sought to refresh the record on broadband access in multi-tenant environments, in comments posted through Thursday in docket 17-142 (see 2109070047). Many telecom and consumer groups urged to limit or outright exclusivity agreements and other practices that limit MTE options for ISPs and consumers. Others argued against additional regulation.

Extend the comments until Nov. 24, replies until Dec. 1, on Embarq Florida's Communications Act Section 214 discontinuance application of its legacy phone service, urged Public Knowledge, the Benton Institute for Internet & Society, Center for Rural Strategies, Common Sense Media, the Communications Workers of America, Incompas and the Media Alliance, in a request posted Monday in docket 21-298. Embarq's, now CenturyLink/Lumen, application "presents novel questions of law and policy" because the FCC "has never relied on wireless services alone to substitute for time-division multiplexing Incumbent local exchange carrier voice service," the groups said.

Congressional leaders and telecom policy observers signaled Thursday they expect major cuts to a budget reconciliation package that Democrats have aimed to include connectivity money. Some believe any move to reduce the scope from the $3.5 trillion congressional Democrats envisioned in August could endanger proposed money for the FCC Emergency Connectivity Fund and next-generation 911 (see 2110010001).

Industry disagrees if the FCC should preempt rights-of-way fees charged Columbia, Missouri, as a violation of Communications Act Section 253, in replies posted Wednesday in docket 21-323 (see 2109230078). Bluebird asked to defer action on its petition "until the legal status of House Bill 271 is settled," which would ban local jurisdictions from charging per linear foot fees, or preempt the city's linear ROW fee if it decides to act. The fees are "excessive, unreasonable, and discriminatory," said Frontier. Granting the petition "will send a strong message to other municipalities," the telco said. Bluebird’s petition is “not a new or novel issue, and the facts as presented, clearly violate Section 253,” said Incompas, saying its members face similar obstacles. The Wireless Infrastructure Association agreed. Commenters showed the monetary amount "is not an isolated problem," said USTelecom, noting the city didn't file an opposition. Localities in Oregon, Washington and California, the League of Minnesota Cities, Metropolitan Area Communications Commission, and ROW Consultants disagreed, saying Congress "did not intend Section 253(d) to authorize the commission to decide local rights of way disputes." The coalition said a public comment process "does not provide an adversarial fact-finding process through which factual issues might be resolved." Localities "should not be forced to come to the FCC to litigate uniquely local issues," said the Communications Workers of America.