DOJ likely will convince the courts to throw out California's new net neutrality law, analysts told us Monday. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and other supporters of the FCC's recent broadband regulation rollback voiced confidence in DOJ's lawsuit, filed in federal court as SB-822 was signed by California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) Sunday. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, Commissioner Mike O'Rielly and their supporters welcomed the suit, while Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel and net neutrality advocates criticized it, and industry rivals called for congressional legislation.

DOJ likely will convince the courts to throw out California's new net neutrality law, analysts told us Monday. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and other supporters of the FCC's recent broadband regulation rollback voiced confidence in DOJ's lawsuit, filed in federal court as SB-822 was signed by California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) Sunday. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, Commissioner Mike O'Rielly and their supporters welcomed the suit, while Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel and net neutrality advocates criticized it, and industry rivals called for congressional legislation.

California net neutrality bill watchers continued to wait for Gov. Jerry Brown (D) to sign or veto SB-822 ahead of a midnight Sunday deadline. With anticipation running high for a lawsuit if California enacts the measure, FCC Republicans continue to signal they view it as pre-empted by their net neutrality deregulation.

California net neutrality bill watchers continued to wait for Gov. Jerry Brown (D) to sign or veto SB-822 ahead of a midnight Sunday deadline. With anticipation running high for a lawsuit if California enacts the measure, FCC Republicans continue to signal they view it as pre-empted by their net neutrality deregulation.

The pace of broadband progress and how it's measured sparked further divisions on the FCC Telecom Act Section 706 inquiry into whether advanced telecom capability (ATC) is being deployed in a reasonable and timely way. Many comments were posted Tuesday in docket 18-238, including over fixed and mobile service distinctions (see 1809170044). Telco and cable incumbents generally said broadband-like ATC is being rolled out adequately, and 5G wireless will bring new advances. Rivals and others cited shortcomings and urged the agency to increase its ATC speed benchmark. The FCC's last 706 report made a positive ATC determination, kept a 25/3 Mbps fixed benchmark and concluded mobile isn't a full substitute for fixed (see 1802050002). Broadband investment and deployment are robust, in part due to light-touch regulation, commented USTelecom. AT&T and Verizon also hailed ATC buildout. AT&T said "mobile broadband is a functional substitute for fixed broadband," and Verizon said providers "stand at the precipice of game-changing 5G network deployments." CTIA called mobile broadband deployment reasonable and timely. NCTA and the American Cable Association urged a positive ATC determination, and they, ITTA, the Wireless ISP Association, Adtran and others backed maintaining the 25/3 Mbps fixed standard. Despite the progress, incumbents said the regulator could do more to spur broadband, but Common Cause and Public Knowledge said recent FCC actions "widened the digital divide." The Communications Workers of America said the pace of broadband deployment isn't reasonable and timely, with more than 24 million Americans lacking access and more lacking high-speed wired connections. Incompas said it's "time to be bold" and raise the benchmark to 1 Gbps, while CWA and others backed 100 Mbps. CWA, Incompas, WISPA, ITTA, rural groups and others said mobile isn't an adequate substitute for fixed. NTCA said only existing, not possible future, services should determine the ATC finding. The Fiber Broadband Association urged a focus on "all-fiber connectivity" and a "holistic approach" factoring in service reliability and latency. ViaSat and SES Americom plugged satellite broadband. New America's Open Technology Institute, Microsoft and others said Form 477 broadband data is flawed and sought fixes and use of other sources. Free Press urged inclusion of data from Puerto Rico and other storm-struck areas and said the FCC should "abandon" proposals to "gut" Lifeline USF. The National Digital Inclusion Alliance cited broadband adoption and affordability as critical and voiced concern about "evidence of AT&T's digital redlining."

The pace of broadband progress and how it's measured sparked further divisions on the FCC Telecom Act Section 706 inquiry into whether advanced telecom capability (ATC) is being deployed in a reasonable and timely way. Many comments were posted Tuesday in docket 18-238, including over fixed and mobile service distinctions (see 1809170044). Telco and cable incumbents generally said broadband-like ATC is being rolled out adequately, and 5G wireless will bring new advances. Rivals and others cited shortcomings and urged the agency to increase its ATC speed benchmark. The FCC's last 706 report made a positive ATC determination, kept a 25/3 Mbps fixed benchmark and concluded mobile isn't a full substitute for fixed (see 1802050002). Broadband investment and deployment are robust, in part due to light-touch regulation, commented USTelecom. AT&T and Verizon also hailed ATC buildout. AT&T said "mobile broadband is a functional substitute for fixed broadband," and Verizon said providers "stand at the precipice of game-changing 5G network deployments." CTIA called mobile broadband deployment reasonable and timely. NCTA and the American Cable Association urged a positive ATC determination, and they, ITTA, the Wireless ISP Association, Adtran and others backed maintaining the 25/3 Mbps fixed standard. Despite the progress, incumbents said the regulator could do more to spur broadband, but Common Cause and Public Knowledge said recent FCC actions "widened the digital divide." The Communications Workers of America said the pace of broadband deployment isn't reasonable and timely, with more than 24 million Americans lacking access and more lacking high-speed wired connections. Incompas said it's "time to be bold" and raise the benchmark to 1 Gbps, while CWA and others backed 100 Mbps. CWA, Incompas, WISPA, ITTA, rural groups and others said mobile isn't an adequate substitute for fixed. NTCA said only existing, not possible future, services should determine the ATC finding. The Fiber Broadband Association urged a focus on "all-fiber connectivity" and a "holistic approach" factoring in service reliability and latency. ViaSat and SES Americom plugged satellite broadband. New America's Open Technology Institute, Microsoft and others said Form 477 broadband data is flawed and sought fixes and use of other sources. Free Press urged inclusion of data from Puerto Rico and other storm-struck areas and said the FCC should "abandon" proposals to "gut" Lifeline USF. The National Digital Inclusion Alliance cited broadband adoption and affordability as critical and voiced concern about "evidence of AT&T's digital redlining."

Sonic Telecom customers are concerned about a USTelecom petition that seeks sweeping FCC regulatory relief for its large incumbent telco members. They fear their rates will rise and their service will be harmed if the FCC grants the forbearance petition to free the ILECs from wholesale duties to lease out their networks as discounted unbundled network elements. Local competitors such as Sonic, a northern California broadband and voice provider, can use UNEs to reach customers where their fiber-based offerings aren't available.

USTelecom's bid for incumbent telco wholesale relief faced further resistance from rivals and others in replies to the FCC due Wednesday, though more large ILECs filed support than initially (see 1808070024). New competitors, some state regulators and consumer advocates said the commission should dismiss or deny the petition. Now, they are joined by more than 8,000 individuals filing substantive opposition, according to Incompas. Our review of docket 18-141 appears to confirm that.

State and local governments and a broad coalition of pro-net neutrality groups and companies said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit should overturn the FCC's "internet freedom" order, approved 3-2 last year, which itself overrode net neutrality rules approved just two years earlier. In the opening volley of a major test of Chairman Ajit Pai’s commission decisions, government petitioners said (in Pacer) the D.C. Circuit should find the FCC had no authority to pre-empt state and local police powers and reject the FCC order as an “arbitrary and capricious” departure from 15 years of FCC policy.

State and local governments and a broad coalition of pro-net neutrality groups and companies said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit should overturn the FCC's "internet freedom" order, approved 3-2 last year, which itself overrode net neutrality rules approved just two years earlier. In the opening volley of a major test of Chairman Ajit Pai’s commission decisions, government petitioners said (in Pacer) the D.C. Circuit should find the FCC had no authority to pre-empt state and local police powers and reject the FCC order as an “arbitrary and capricious” departure from 15 years of FCC policy.