International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from May 17-21 in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
No date has been scheduled yet for a vote on the China package championed by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., but lengthy amendments from senators are continuing to flow in, many with trade implications.
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., said he's "conceptionally comfortable" with changes to the Generalized System of Preferences benefits program proposed by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore. (see 2105180075), and that "once the staff gives us a green light on it, we'll try to get it done." Neal, who spoke with an International Trade Today reporter in a brief interview at the Capitol May 19, said the renewal of GSP and the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill may be able to move expeditiously. He said he and Wyden are closely aligned on their views on trade.
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, announced that he's introducing a bill that would renew the Generalized System of Preferences benefits program through Jan. 1, 2027, and renew the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill through the end of 2023.
U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai, in her second day of testimony on Capitol Hill, heard again and again from members of Congress who are hearing from companies in their districts that they want Section 301 tariff exclusions back. She heard repeatedly that the 9% countervailing duties on Canadian lumber are making a bad situation worse. And she heard that the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill and Generalized System of Preferences benefits program should be renewed. On each topic, both Democrats and Republicans shared concerns, though on GSP, Republicans only spoke of the cost to importers, while Democrats worried about the effects of GSP on the eligible countries. Tai testified for more than four hours in front of the House Ways and Means Committee on May 13.
U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai generally avoided being pinned down on timing as she was asked about rekindling trade negotiations with the United Kingdom and Kenya, the pause on tariffs on European imports, and a solution for steel overcapacity that could make way for the lifting of Section 232 tariffs.
International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from May 3-7 in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
Rep. Darin LaHood, R-Ill., introduced legislation that would “incorporate digital trade as a statutory consideration in designating beneficiary developing countries (BDCs) under” the Generalized System of Preferences, he said in a May 7 new release. The bill would allow the U.S. trade representative to “prevent countries from receiving BCD status if, for example, they restrict digital trade to the detriment of U.S. strategic interests through predatory industrial policies that target technology sectors,” it said. Some developing countries seem to be following China's lead in implementing problematic digital trade measures, LaHood's office said. “These countries benefit from duty-free access to American markets under the GSP while employing digital policies that undermine American values, jobs, and exports. Updating and reforming the GSP to support sound digital trade policies will advance American strategic interests around the world and promote sound economic development in the developing world.”
The top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee said he doesn't have a good sense of when the renewal of the Generalized System of Preferences benefits program or the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill could come up for a vote in the House, where the bills must originate. Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, told International Trade Today during a May 6 press call that Senate Finance Committee ranking member Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., are engaging about both programs, in the context of a China bill that committee is working on. “I think any discussion at this point is helpful,” he said. Brady said he thinks the two bills could move sooner if they were made a priority in the House, since they have both stood on their own in the past, and have passed under suspension rules or unanimous consent, which means they don't take up significant time on the legislative calendar.
International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from April 26-30 in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.