CTIA, the Ohio Telecom Association, USTelecom, NCTA, the Wireless ISP Association and other ISP groups asked the 6th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court to stay the FCC’s net neutrality order (see 2406100044). The FCC wants to move the case to the D.C. Circuit and has declined to stay the order, which takes effect July 22. The agency “has asserted total authority over how Americans access the Internet,” according to a joint motion filed Monday (docket 24-3450). “That is not hyperbole,” the groups said. The order “is only the latest jolt in a decade of regulatory whiplash for ISPs,” the associations said. After nearly 20 years of a light-touch approach to regulating the internet, in 2015 the FCC asserted for the first time authority over high-speed internet access service under Title II of the Communications Act, the filing said: Before the U.S. Supreme Court “could weigh in, a new Administration reverted to the traditional light-touch approach. Now, after another change in Administration, the Commission is back to a heavy hand, promising to make even more aggressive use of its claimed powers.” The court should stay “the latest flip-flop pending judicial review” since “petitioners are overwhelmingly likely to succeed on the merits,” the ISPs said. They argue that the order should be rejected under the Supreme Court’s evolving major questions doctrine. “Because the Commission cannot point to clear congressional authorization for applying common-carrier regulation to the Internet, the Order is unlawful,” they said.
Howard Buskirk
Howard Buskirk, Executive Senior Editor, joined Warren Communications News in 2004, after covering Capitol Hill for Telecommunications Reports. He has covered Washington since 1993 and was formerly executive editor at Energy Business Watch, editor at Gas Daily and managing editor at Natural Gas Week. Previous to that, he was a staff reporter for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and the Greenville News. Follow Buskirk on Twitter: @hbuskirk
The FCC urged the 6th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court Friday to move the challenge to the FCC’s net neutrality order to the D.C. Circuit (docket 24-3450). The FCC also issued an order declining to stay the rules, which take effect July 22, pending judicial review.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit gave Chinese companies Hikvision and Dahua a partial victory Tuesday, ruling that the FCC’s definition of critical infrastructure is “overly broad.” However, the three-judge panel rejected arguments that video cameras and video-surveillance equipment the companies manufacture shouldn’t have been placed on the agency’s “covered list” of unsecure gear.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit handed Chinese companies Hikvision and Dahua a partial victory Tuesday, holding in an opinion (docket 23-1032) that the FCC’s definition of critical infrastructure is “overly broad.” The three-judge panel rejected arguments that video cameras and video-surveillance equipment the companies manufactured shouldn’t have been placed on the FCC’s “covered list” of unsecure gear. The case was argued in December (see 2312140061).
Following last week’s oral argument in two Chevron cases before the U.S. Supreme Court (see 2401170074), the future of the doctrine appears in doubt.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority appeared receptive to industry arguments that the court should overturn, or at least narrow, the Chevron doctrine, which gives agencies like the FCC and FTC deference in interpreting laws that Congress passes. The court heard oral argument Wednesday for more than 3.5 hours in two cases challenging Chevron deference, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless v. Commerce. Both concern fishing regulations and don’t touch directly on communications regulation.
Fred Moorefield, who long oversaw spectrum policy at DOD, was charged with promoting and furthering animal fighting. Moorefield has been on leave from DOD, where he was deputy chief information officer-command, control and communications. Industry officials said Monday's announcement was a surprise but may have limited effect since Moorefield’s retirement was expected. Charges were filed in U.S. District Court for Maryland.
Hikvision, Dahua and the U.S. government made final arguments on whether the FCC wrongly barred gear from the Chinese companies from being authorized under the agency’s equipment authorization program and wrongly placed the companies on the FCC’s “covered list.” The pleadings were filed Wednesday at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit (docket 23-1032). Oral argument hasn’t been scheduled in the case.
The FCC rightly put Hikvision and Dahua video equipment on its “covered list” of network gear deemed to pose a threat to U.S. security, Motorola Solutions said in a brief filed Tuesday at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit (docket 23-1032). The Chinese companies are challenging the classification (see 2308310001) in the FCC’s Nov. 25 order barring authorization of network equipment on the covered list (see 2304250043).
DOJ sided with Dish Network, against T-Mobile, over whether Dish should get more time to buy 800 MHz spectrum, filing Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which is handling T-Mobile’s buy of Sprint (see 2308170065). The government supports giving Dish until April 1 to buy the spectrum, or pay a $72 million fee for walking away from the deal (see 1907260071). Dish asked for an extension through June 30.